Culture and Capital – how economic systems shape what we make, value and imagine

From the commodification of art to the gig economy, from consumerism to climate capitalism – how money shapes culture and culture shapes us

Culture and Capital explores how economic structures, political ideologies and material conditions shape everyday life, from work and consumption to creativity and resistance. Culture does not exist apart from the systems that sustain it.

Capitalism does not only shape markets. It shapes imagination. It influences what kinds of lives feel possible, what kinds of labour feel legitimate, what kinds of stories dominate public space, what kinds of art get made and by whom and for whom. Understanding culture means understanding capital, not as an abstract economic system, but as the lived reality that determines what resources are available, what risks can be taken, whose experiences are reflected and whose are invisible.

This hub gathers Pen vs Sword’s writing on the intersection of culture and economic systems. It is concerned with the full range of that intersection: the art market and how it determines what paintings are worth, the music industry and how it shapes what music gets made, the digital economy and how it has transformed the relationship between creative work and commercial value.

It is also concerned with the political economy of culture in a broader sense: how economic inequality shapes access to culture, how cultural institutions reproduce class advantage, how global capitalism has transformed the conditions under which art is made and circulated. And it is concerned with the ways in which culture itself can be a form of resistance to the economic logic that surrounds it.

How capitalism shapes culture – and culture shapes capitalism

The relationship between culture and capital is not one-directional. It is not simply that economic structures determine what culture is produced, consumed and valued, though they do. It is also that culture shapes economic structures: the stories a society tells about success, merit and inevitability; the values that are transmitted through education, media and popular culture; the aspirations that make people willing to accept conditions that are not, on objective analysis, in their interest.

This is what Antonio Gramsci meant by “hegemony”: the way in which ruling-class values become common sense, embedded in the habits and assumptions of everyday life so thoroughly that they are no longer experienced as ideology but as reality. Arundhati Roy’s writing on the Narmada Dam, on Hindu nationalism, on corporate power, is one of the most sustained analyses of this process from within a society undergoing it in real time.

The analysis of how big tech platforms reshape cultural imagination is explored in depth in our account of social media’s double edge and how the same tools used for activism are simultaneously instruments of commercial surveillance and behavioural management.

The art market – how money determines what art is worth

The contemporary art market is one of the most extreme examples of cultural capital: a system in which the financial value of a work bears almost no relationship to its aesthetic merit, its social function, or the labour that produced it, but is determined by the speculative decisions of a tiny global elite.

The Guerrilla Girls have documented, with devastating statistical precision, how the art market’s mechanisms reproduce racial and gender inequality: how women artists and artists of colour are systematically underrepresented in museum collections and gallery shows, and how this underrepresentation is then naturalised as a reflection of aesthetic merit rather than structural exclusion.

The political economy of information has its own parallel: the case of Aaron Swartz, whose campaign for open access to academic knowledge (and whose prosecution and death) shows what happens when the logic of enclosure is applied to ideas rather than land. His story is as much about capitalism and culture as it is about internet freedom.

The music industry – from record labels to streaming and the politics of sound

The music industry has been through more transformations in the past three decades than in the previous century. Lowkey is a British-Iraqi rapper whose work addresses Palestine, racism, and the operations of empire. He represents a tradition of music that refuses the commodification of political expression. His music circulates partly outside the mainstream industry channels precisely because its political content makes it unsuitable for the kind of commercial promotion that generates chart success.

Tropicalia in Brazil demonstrated what happens when political music becomes commercially threatening enough: Caetano Veloso and Gilberto Gil were arrested by the military government and forced into exile in London. The regime recognised, correctly, that their music was dangerous, not because of any specific message but because of what it modelled: a freedom of imagination that the dictatorship required to suppress.

The Pirate Bay’s history from Napster to AI traces the economics of digital music from a different angle: the long battle over copyright, streaming rights and who actually controls access to cultural production in the digital age.

Digital capitalism – surveillance, the gig economy and the new precariat

Shoshana Zuboff’s concept of surveillance capitalism, developed in her 2019 book and brought to bear on digital culture and it describes the economic logic by which platforms like Google and Meta extract human behavioural data as raw material, process it into predictions, and sell those predictions to advertisers. The cultural consequences are profound. Our account of behaviourism and operant conditioning shows the psychological mechanisms that make this extraction possible: the reward loops, the variable reinforcement schedules, the engineered compulsions that keep users generating data.

The Africa that global capital has systematically misrepresented and exploited is shown in a different light in our piece Africa is not a country in which we examine how stereotypes serve economic interests and how a continent of extraordinary cultural and economic diversity has been reduced, in the Western imagination, to a single story of need.

Counter-cultures and commons – culture outside the market

The history of capitalism is also the history of its refusals. The commons (resources held collectively and managed by the communities that use them), is one of the oldest and most contested concepts in political economy. Aaron Swartz’s campaign for open access to academic knowledge was, in this sense, a campaign for the digital commons: the insistence that publicly funded research should be publicly accessible, not enclosed by the subscription paywalls of academic publishers.

The climate crisis is capitalism’s most consequential cultural product and is the result of an economic system built on the externalisation of environmental costs. Our account of the climate crisis and the heat of truth examines how capitalism has shaped not just the crisis itself but the cultural and informational environments that have made it so difficult to respond to, and what art, writing and activism can do in response.

Naomi Klein’s work, from No Logo to The Shock Doctrine to her current writing on the intersections of fascism and capital represents the most sustained and publicly accessible analysis of how capitalism shapes culture, politics and possibility. It is the essential companion reading for everything on this page.

THE BIGGER PICTURE

Capital is not only an economic system. It is a cultural one, which means that the questions asked on every other page of this site are, at some level, questions about capital too. The images explored in Art and Power are produced and circulated within markets that determine their value. The movements documented in Resistance and Solidarity organise against economic conditions as much as political ones.

The narratives examined in Language, Media and Truth are shaped by ownership structures that are ultimately questions of capital. The futures imagined in Future Imaginaries are, almost all of them, imagining something other than the economic present. And the music celebrated in Music, Sound and Cultural Memory has always been made in tension with the industry that seeks to commodify it. Culture and capital are not one subject among many. They are the frame through which all the others can be seen.

Read more about culture and capital in our full articles on the complete guide to major art movements from 1850 to now, the Gutai Art Movement – Japan’s radical post-war avant-garde and art as political and cultural expression.

JOIN THE PVS READERSHIP

Culture and Capital Archive Suggestions

SWORD PEN

History of activism – protests that shaped the world 

PEN

The Pirate Bay: From Napster to AI

PEN

The Architecture of Power

PEN

The Climate Crisis and the Heat of Truth

WORDSMITHS PEN

Aldous Huxley – Brave New World, politics and dark visions

PEN

Tiokasin Ghosthorse – indigenous voice, music and philosophy

MOVING IMAGES PEN

Zarina Zabrisky – frontline journalist and Ukraine’s witness

PEN

Whose Future Is It Anyway?

WANT MORE?

Browse the full Pen archive, with thought-provoking articles and compelling opinions from historical and contemporary voices that explore today’s pressing questions, providing you with a fresh perspective on contemporary issues which extend beyond the features above.

• CONNECT WITH THE WIDER ECOSYSTEM

  You might also be interested in these categories which offer different angles on Culture and Capital – offering: attention, historical context, and critical distance. In a media environment designed to overwhelm, that in itself is a form of resistance.

All of our content is free to access. An independent magazine nonetheless requires investment, so if you take value from any of our content, please consider sharing, subscribing to our mailing list or donating if you can. Your support is always gratefully received.